By definition
set forth in Article 22 of Act No. 138/1973 (Waters Act), waste
water is “water used by housing projects, municipalities, houses,
industrial plants, health care facilities, and other buildings or
facilities if the use changes its quality (composition or
temperature) as well as other waters discharged by them if they can
pose a threat the quality of surface water or groundwater”.
There are two
drainage systems in the territory of Prague. The so-called
separation system keeps sewage and rainwater separate and a
universal system which uses a single pipeline to carry both sewage
and rainwater. The central sewage and rainwater collection system
was started in the beginning of the 20th century as a universal
system. The sewer diameter in this system increases as far as
so-called separating chambers (more often known as rainwater
separators) which subject to achieving a predetermined dilution
ratio (sewage: rainwater ratio) allow a part of the mixture to be
discharged directly into surface streams and the diameter of sewers
to the waste treatment plant to be reduced. According to the initial
concept the dilution ratio should have been 1:2. However, as the
city grew, its value changed to 1:1 for the Vltava River, and 1:4
for creeks. As water from rainwater separators has not so far been
regarded or perceived as waste water there is practically no
monitoring of the pollution discharged from the separators into
surface streams; water pollution charges are based on an educated
guess and paid only for those separators that do not comply with the
relevant dilution ratio.
The EEC Council
Directive of May 21, 1991 on the treatment of municipal waste water
(91/271/EEC) explicitly regards the mixture of sewage and rainwater
as “municipal waste water”.
The Ministry of
Agriculture of the Czech Republic is working on a new drainage
concept represented by the currently prepared Drainage Master Plan
of Prague. It will take into account the target stream water quality
be in compliance with pending legislation changes and thus should
not pose any problem whatsoever in relation to the accession of the
Czech Republic to the European Union.
Waste water from
the city centre and newly built housing schemes are discharged into
a sewage and rainwater collection system which empties into the
Central Waste Water Treatment Plant (ÚCOV) in Císarský ostrov,
Troja. In addition to the central plant there are 24 small waste
water treatment plants (COV) being built or operating in the
territory of Prague. As a rule these handle sewage only and serve
small townships and villages in Prague’s territory.
In 1997 the
following small waste water treatment plants were operated on a
“permanent” basis: Certouzy, Chvaly, Miškovice, Radotín (till August
1997), Sedlec, Újezd nad Lesy, Prední Kopanina, Nedvezí, Vinor,
Zbraslav, and Dolní Chabry. The following small waste water
treatment plants were put into operation during 1997: Královice,
Klánovice, Kolodeje, Kolovraty, and Kbely. Operational tests were
going on in the following small waste water treatment plants:
Brezineves (commissioned in September 1997), Ruzyne Airport,
Uhríneves, Bechovice, and Nebušice. In Lipence, Sobín, and Holyne
the construction of new COVs started.
Most of the
small waste water treatment plants have been built since 1989 as a
result of initiatives of elected members of district authorities who
refused to wait until a long-distance trunk sewage collector
bringing waste water to the Central Waste Water Treatment Plant
reaches their village. Different opinions regarding the drainage
system have led to a situation in which the state-owned enterprise
PVK (nowadays PVK a.s.) does not operate some of the treatment
plants such as Bechovice, Klánovice, Kolodeje, Královice, Nedvezí,
Prední Kopanina, and Zbraslav.
Selected water quality
criteria measured at intakes and discharges of the Central Waste
Water Treatment Plant (ÚCOV) and permanently operating Waste Water
Treatment Plants (COV) in mg.l
-1
|
|
Flow [l.s-1] |
BOD
|
COD (Cr)
|
NL
|
N-NH3 |
P total
|
|
intake
|
dis- charge |
intake
|
dis- charge |
intake
|
dis- charge |
intake
|
dis- charge |
intake
|
dis- charge |
|
ÚCOV Troja
|
5 400.00
|
173.90
|
37.90
|
420.00
|
126.00
|
277.90
|
68.10
|
17.10
|
12.50
|
5.50
|
3.00
|
|
Certouzy
|
30.27
|
166.80
|
8.20
|
456.90
|
71.40
|
279.00
|
27.80
|
27.50
|
8.60
|
7.30
|
4.70
|
|
Chvaly
|
6.12
|
296.00
|
3.60
|
728.00
|
49.00
|
330.80
|
7.20
|
40.30
|
16.50
|
12.10
|
4.70
|
|
Miškovice
|
102.80
|
76.90
|
8.30
|
219.40
|
57.40
|
143.10
|
19.70
|
12.50
|
3.60
|
4.40
|
2.30
|
|
Sedlec
|
12.30
|
194.20
|
8.30
|
550.80
|
54.10
|
253.30
|
14.00
|
38.00
|
20.20
|
7.80
|
2.70
|
|
Újezd n.
L. |
23.74
|
100.50
|
8.30
|
271.30
|
60.90
|
147.80
|
15.30
|
28.70
|
6.10
|
6.50
|
3.20
|
Source: PVK
a.s., COV
The operation of
the sewage and rainwater collection system is governed by a set of
rules which stipulates especially requirements pertaining to the
quality of waste water discharged into the system. As far as the
region served by the Central Waste Water Treatment Plant is
concerned, waste water producers are divided into two groups: one
comprises key producers of industrial waste water to which
individual water quality limits are applied, the other all other
producers in respect of which general criteria are used.
Results of audits focused on compliance
with sewage and rainwater collection system operating rules
|
Production branches |
Number
of samples |
|
1992
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
|
total
|
ex- ceeded |
total
|
ex- ceeded |
total
|
ex- ceeded |
total
|
ex- ceeded |
total
|
ex- ceeded |
total
|
ex- ceeded |
|
Machine
industries |
162
|
84
|
280
|
128
|
109
|
43
|
148
|
58
|
148
|
69
|
172
|
66
|
|
Chemistry
|
59
|
36
|
63
|
38
|
70
|
34
|
93
|
47
|
50
|
27
|
63
|
30
|
|
Power
supply |
6
|
1
|
43
|
7
|
24
|
6
|
24
|
11
|
16
|
4
|
19
|
3
|
|
Food
industry |
35
|
26
|
69
|
47
|
68
|
41
|
71
|
53
|
47
|
25
|
44
|
22
|
|
Printing
industry |
10
|
9
|
9
|
5
|
24
|
9
|
12
|
10
|
7
|
5
|
6
|
3
|
|
Other
|
46
|
25
|
73
|
39
|
57
|
21
|
92
|
36
|
83
|
11
|
75
|
16
|
|
Total
|
318
|
181
|
547
|
264
|
352
|
154
|
440
|
215
|
351
|
141
|
379
|
140
|
|
per cent
|
|
57%
|
|
48%
|
|
44%
|
|
49%
|
|
40%
|
|
37%
|
Source: PVK
a.s.
Compared to 1996
there was an increased number of audits in 1997. Only chemical
enterprises showed worse results than in 1996, other groups have
improved. As to the magnitude of failures to meet the applicable
limits the numbers of samples exceeding the limit by a hundred or a
thousand per cent remain the same.
It still holds that producers of waste water pay so-called “contractual fines
” if
they do not comply with the limits. The system will have to
re-assessed in the framework of a trial operation of the refurbished
Central Waste Water Treatment Plant as the fines are often less
costly than investments needed to rectify the situation once the
existing capacity of the plant is used to the full.
The compliance
with the limits laid down in the set of rules referred to above also
affects the contents of heavy metals in digested sludge which is one
of the products of the waste water treatment process. A reduction of
the content of heavy metals in the digested sludge would permit it
to be re-used for agricultural purposes.
In July 1997
Phase Ia of the Central Waste Water Treatment Plant Upgrading
project was completed, its purpose being to eliminate the
discrepancy between the hitherto different capacities of the
mechanical stage (up to 8.4 m3.s-1) and the
biological stage (4.6 m3.s-1), and to provide
for removing nitrogen and phosphorus from waste water.
Although the
average waste water inflow in 1997 was lower than the year before,
the load of the Central Waste Water Treatment Plant in terms of the
dry matter contents continued to increase. As the nature of the
waste water processed by the plant is variable, the actual capacity
of the upgraded waste water facility can be determined only on the
basis of its trial operation which commenced in August 1997 and was
initially scheduled to take one year. Because of the variable nature
of the waste water it is expected that the trial phase will have to
be extended to accumulate enough hard data giving a good idea of the
plant’s actual capacity.
In the framework
of the restructuring of Prazské vodárny, s.p., and Prazská
kanalizace a vodní toky, s.p., the infrastructure assets operated by
the two companies were transferred to new owners as of December 30,
1997. The new owners are: Prague City Hall and associations of
municipalities “Úpravna vody Zelivka” and “Zdroj pitné vody Káraný”.
The National Property Fund of the Czech Republic created two
joint-stock companies to manage and operate the infrastructure:
Prazská vodohospodárská spolecnost, a.s. (PVS a.s.), responsible for
a harmonized management, development, and investments into the
property of the three new owners, and Prazské vodovody a kanalizace,
a.s. (PVK a.s.), responsible for operational matters.
Production of
pollutants in the territory of Prague in 1997
|
|
BOD
|
t.year-1 |
NL
|
t.year-1 |
Flows
|
|
production |
release
|
production |
release
|
m3.year-1 |
|
ÚCOV Praha
|
31 847
|
6 911
|
50 876
|
12 372
|
141 863
019 |
|
PCOV Praha
|
831.0
|
55
|
1 387
|
140
|
7 693 449
|
|
Rainwater
separators |
50.1
|
50.08
|
156.75
|
156.75
|
238 938
|
|
Total
|
32 728
|
7 016
|
52 420
|
12 669
|
149 795
406 |
Source: PVK
a.s.
Selected water quality criteria at the
intake/discharge of the Central Waste Water Treatment Plant