Urbanisation,
depopulation, national consolidation
Text by:
Revaz Gachechiladze, "Population Migration in Georgia and Its
Socio-Economic Consequences". Discussion Paper Series - UNDP, 1997.
Despite the problems of urbanisation of
Georgia, and especially of Tbilisi during the Soviet period, there
were positive outcomes as well. Among them, we consider the most
important to be the role Tbilisi played in forming a single Georgia
and the Georgian nation.
The fact that since medieval times up to the
19 th century (and, by inertia, for a certain period in
the 20th century) the term "city" and the popular name of
Tbilisi (both "kalaki" - in Georgian) were the same, means that
Tbilisi was of special significamce for the Georgians. In the
language of a Georgian sub-ethnic group - Megrelian - Tbilisi is
called "Karti" (the Abkhazian language also uses the same
pronunciation of the name ofd Tbilisi, probably under influence of
Megrelian). This indicates that the city is identified with the
central province of Georgia "Kartli", from which the eleventh
century medieval nation-state "Sakartvelo" derived its name.
"Sakartvelo" is the vernacular pronunciation of the name of the
contemporary state of Georgia.
All sub-ethnic groups of the Georgians
considered Tbilisi as the only political and cultural centre of
all-Georgia and not of a single province. Whoever ruled Tbilisi was
recognized as the legal ruler of all Georgia. From a
historical-geographical viewpoint Tbilisi is actually on the border
of two major provinces of East Georgia - Kartli and Kakheti (but
more within Kartli). Its central position in the Southern Caucasus
is even more apparent. Tbilisi has served as regional centre
throughout the last several centuries regardless of who was in power
- Perian Shah, Russian Emperor, or the General Secretaries of
ACP(B), (i.e. the All-Union Communist Party, Boloshevik). Within the
Russian Empire Tbilisi served as the centre of the entire Caucasus
and was the seat of the viceroy. Tbilisi ceased to perform the
formal role of the regional centre in 1936 when the TSFSR
(Transcaucasian Soviet federal Socialist Republic) with its capital
in Tbilisi was dissolved.
Even before the declaration of independence
of the Georgian Democratic Republic (1918) the Georgian intellectual
elite began to concentrate in Tbilisi. Already by the early 20
th century it had drawn the cultural elite of Kutaisi,
the centre of another Georgian gubernia. Due to migration from the
West Georgian provinces by the beginning of the 1920s more than half
of Tbilisi'ds ethnic Georgian population was from these provinces.
After Tbilisi was declared the capital of independent Georgia, the
political elite were also draw from the western provinces to
Tbilisi. Notably, the Tbilisi inteligentsia and the newly migrated
intellegentsia from western Georgia never engaged in serious
conflicts on a sub-ethnic level because these elites always regarded
of paramount interest not the regional, but the all-georgian
issues.
During the Soviet period the migration of the
ethnic Georgian population to Tbilisi continued to increase.
According to the 1926 Population Census 6% (112 thousand) of all
ethnic Georgians lived in Tbilisi. The 1989 Population Census shows
that 26% (824 thousand) of all ethnic Georgians lived in Tbilisi. A
more than sevenfold increase in ethnic Georgian population of
Tbilisi during 63 years cannot even theoretically be attributed to
natural growth. This growth is the result of population
migration.
Currently Tbilisi is more populated than any
single province of Georgia, and "Tbiliseli" (Tbilisi dweller) has
become a supre-regional term which embraces representatives of all
georgian sub-ethnic groups and ethnic non-Georgians as well. Tbilisi
played and still plays the role of "melting pot" of the Georgian
nation.
There are critical views concerning the excessive growth of
Tbilisi and of the turning of Georgia into a "tadpole country" with
very large capital city and smaller rural population due to it. But
this viewpoint is not precise. The process of urbanization in
georgia and the population migration to Tbilisi must be evaluated as
predominantly
positive.


